Web Advertising: Google vs. Facebook

Under the wings of an aspiring startup and managing a blog with sustained Ad-sense revenue, I feel I'm at a point where I can seriously comment on the value of a both ad-platforms.

A Google Ad-words account is essentially the bread-and-butter of any fledgling service-based company's success. Initializing a good campaign and learning from your mistakes are essential to boosting your page-rank and meaningful ad-conversions. The Page-Rank algorithm (Google's method of ranking your page in search results) is highly secretive, one can only make reasonable conjecture's as to how it works.

Gone are the days of keyword tracking (thanks to keyword spammers). Now we're looking at an algorithm based off of quantity of back-links, back-link rank, site-maps AND keyword matching. It makes me wonder - is there an allocation for ad-words spending? Think about it - spending money on an ad-words campaign is going to help you achieve both impressions and clicks that are registered in google's servers. This would undoubtedly boost your page-rank.

Does this mean that an ad-words initiative is integral to a startup's success? I hope not.

I have a few problems with ad-words. Like the original query-indexes, all ad results are based on keyword and key-phrase matching. What if I want to target a specific demographic (age-group, professional in a certain field/job-type, etc.)? Moreover, what if my content is catered specifically to a demographic that is technologically proficient and uses firefox and/or chrome? These individuals are more likely to have ad-block enabled and if not, even less likely to click a "stupid Google ad".

That's where facebook ad's come in. Not only are they cheaper, they allow me to connect with specific demographics based on their account information. Now we're talking.

Unfortunately, these facebook ads are not related to search, therefore I require both an ad-words and facebook ad campaign to make sure I'm targeting both search content and demographic relationships.

Now rewind a few months back to Google Buzz. The advent of Buzz made me update and refine my Google profile and it got me thinking... Google now has some of my personal information (age, interests, jobs, etc.). Does this mean that Google ads will soon be "interest and demographic targeted" to users logged into their Google accounts while searching? 

It only makes sense. I'm sure Google is already identifying my search habits and building it's own profile of who I am - why not help it? After all, I am paying their bills.

boom.

Is Content King? Apple vs. Google

Apple this, Google that. The two behemoths seem to be in a continuous fight over technology and data. Jobs says nay to Google as the iPhone's default QI (that's right, query index - that's some serious pre-Y2K throw-back buzz wordage). Google integrates multi-touch into their android platform.

 In my personal opinion, Google has all of their eggs in a single basket - user-generated advertisements. How else do they really make money? 

The true discussion should be around the value of building a content delivery platform. I'm not talking about an online banner ad service that none of my specific demographic ever clicks-on, I'm talking about a hardware device that people will inevitably use on the day-to-day. I'm talking Kindle, BlackBerry, iPhone.... iPad.

Guaranteed, Mr.Jobs had communicated with a variety of content publishers during the initial design of the device - before designers even decided to make a giant iPod. In fact, Jobs has created a compelling platform on all sides of the content fence with delivery methods in both the hardware and software domains. 

So now you have a really sexy and intuitive piece of hardware that anyone can use and an entire network of pre-existing, extremely popular services that tons of people already love.  

And now, that extremely amazing device is forcing Google out of the equation. No Google Search, no picasa photo-albums. Ads will continuously appear on the device in a variety of forms but the generated money will now end up in the pockets of Mr. Jobs rather then Mr. Page or Mr. Brin. 

Sure Google is making a go at this with Android, but they haven't really figured out a way to make money with it yet.

The iPad will liven up the struggling print-media industry at the benefit of Apple alone. Once again, Jobs has targeted a struggling niche with a fantastic device that I personally hate to love.

As we hurtle forwards into the new age of ad/partnership-oriented consumer devices and platforms, I'm sure we'll see many contenders rise and fall. If I had to choose a content king? I'd go with Apple hands-down.

-Michael Litt